The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by President Donald Trump to enforce new U.S. Postal Service regulations for mail voting, lifting uncertainty for election officials nationwide as voting gets underway for the November midterm elections.
The Supreme Court left intact a lower court decision that blocked the U.S. Postal Service from enforcing new mail-voting regulations in the run-up to the midterm elections, rejecting the Trump administration’s effort to move forward with the rules. The decision provides a major victory for the status quo, allowing thousands of election offices across the country to send out mail ballots as they had intended without worrying about complying with new Postal Service rules imposed at the 11th hour.
Supreme Court Decision Removes Midterm Voting Uncertainty
Even with voting already underway, uncertainty about what might come next had been hovering over preparations for this year’s midterm elections. The U.S. Supreme Court lifted much of that uncertainty late Monday when it rejected President Donald Trump’s push to have the U.S. Postal Service play a central role in deciding who would be able to receive a mail ballot. The legal battle stemmed from an executive order Trump signed in March. The administration developed a plan that would require states to adopt a uniform envelope style for mailed ballots and submit lists of eligible voters to an online portal it was developing, with the Postal Service able to refuse to deliver ballots to states that didn’t comply.
A whistleblower report said the postal system’s requirements could lead to millions of mail ballots never being sent, disenfranchising many of the country’s voters during an election that will decide control of Congress during the final two years of Trump’s term. A tangle of legal challenges, rapid-fire rulings and appeals left election officials uncertain about what rules would ultimately be in place, though they agreed that introducing such massive changes so close to a general election would be chaotic and nearly impossible to pull off in a country where roughly a third of voters use mail ballots. The Supreme Court’s decision comes as mail voting is already in progress in some states, and some election officials had said they were worried the late dispute would leave voters confused about what’s allowed.
Relief for Mail-In Voting States and Election Officials
Voting rights advocates and state election officials moved swiftly after Monday’s decision to make clear that elections will function as they always have in each state. Utahns can have confidence that the 2026 election will proceed as normal,
said Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, a Republican serving as the state’s chief election officer. The concern was particularly acute in the eight states where voters cast ballots almost entirely by mail: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington. These jurisdictions had faced the daunting challenge of adapting in short order without an extensive network of polling places.
Now, we can finally move forward and get back to what we do best: conducting our elections without a dark cloud hanging over us — fairly, openly, for the people, by the people,
California Secretary of State Shirley Weber, a Democrat who oversees voting in a state where all voters receive a mail ballot, said in a statement after the decision.
Shirley Weber, California Secretary of State
Other state election chiefs expressed similar relief following the decision. This is a victory for Oregonians, the right to vote, and the rule of law," said Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, a Democrat.
Tobias Read, Oregon Secretary of State
Read added that this provides voters and elections officials with the certainty they need ahead of a major, federal election, and it sends a clear message to this country: Presidents don’t run elections, the people do.
Mixed Signals and Ongoing Debates Over Future Administration
Although lower courts had blocked the Trump administration from implementing its rules, the Supreme Court rejected the administration’s attempt to stay those decisions. Even so, three justices — Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas — expressed various levels of willingness to let Trump carry out his plan in current or future elections.
Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar said his reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision is one of relief, but also excitement, because today the voters really won across America.
In Nevada’s June primary, more than half of voters cast ballots by mail, making it a state where mail voting is “critical” to voter voices being heard, Aguilar said. But the Democrat noted that some of the damage has already been done,
with false claims about mail ballots affecting people’s confidence in the voting method. You can trust the process,
Aguilar urged voters, adding, Please participate.
Ещё по этой теме
